Social reading

Shelfari, Goodreads, LibraryThing, Booklikes, Scribd.

Kindle, Nook, Kobo…

The world is changing towards a more technology oriented perspective on arts. This is not something new. It’s becoming a fact.

People spend more time using technology, more time on the web, more time using social media, so it makes sense that they’d spend more and more time reading in a similar manner.

Reading paperbacks and hardcovers has become an old school thing. People read e-books, listen to audio-books, post reviews on blogs.

This element makes it easier. It’s more comfortable.

But is it necessarily better?

Imagine driving your car while listening to an audio-book. Imagine spending 8+ hours staring at a screen.

Now, what I’m really trying to say it, that spending quality time by yourself, getting fully emerged in the story as it unfolds, suspending disbelief, all those things require a certain level of engagement.

For these reasons, I’m not sure. For these reasons, I still prefer reading paperbacks. Sitting on my chair, utter silence, nothing but the words on paper to keep me company.

No distractions, no screens, nothing…

You can even call me old fashioned, and at this very moment, it’s probably just a thing of personal preference.

What is your opinion? Paperbacks or e-books? Old or new? Which one do you prefer? And why? 


10 thoughts on “Social reading

  1. It depends on the book… if it’s an easy going romance I prefer ebooks if it’s a more serious book from which I want to learn something I prefer paper back so I can takes notes and mark important pages… 🍀

  2. Books are more than their words: they’re the smell of dust; the weight in your hands; the whispering of pages turned; the creaking spine traced by a restless finger. Books will always be better than screens. That said, there are benefits to e-books. You use less space to carry more books wherever you travel. You don’t need a light to see a screen and you don’t have to fret away impatient hours, waiting for your book to arrive.

  3. More to books than ebooks. I can’t sit for hours facing the laptop/phone screen. Books give me the comfort of sitting in a corner with a cup of tea to enjoy the day. It gives me eye strain when on a laptop.

  4. I usually prefer physical books over ebooks, but I have a small collection of ebooks that are mostly either public domain classics, books that’d be hard to find in physical form, or classics that were on sale. But there are some books on my bucket list that I’d rather have in physical form (like Slaughterhouse-Five or One Hundred Years of Solitude) because I feel the *need* to hold those books in my hands.

  5. I read all sorts of news online, email newsletters, blogs, etc., but when it comes to reading books I always read them in print. Reading a book is more relaxing, more engaging and separates you from the perpetual interruptions that occur on personal screens.

  6. I personally like both forms, but in different occassions. For example, when I wish to relax or before I go to sleep, a paperback is a typical and much-prefered choice, while when I’m on the road, or I wish to read things my friends, aqcuaintances and favourite bloggers write, I use my laptop. I honestly just believe that it’s a matter of circumstance.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.